Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service


victorylee0516
(victoria lee)
41F
3081 posts
1/16/2008 1:05 pm
Smellier Than Stinky Tofu


In an October 24 column noting recent coverage by the Los Angeles Times and the New York Post of certain contributions to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-NY) presidential campaign by Asian-Americans, right-wing pundit and nationally syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin referred to "Hillary campaign contributors" who were "smellier than stinky tofu."

From her column:

Both papers uncovered dishwashers, cooks and other suspect Hillary campaign contributors in New York's Chinatown, Flushing, the Bronx, and Brooklyn who were limited-income, limited-English-proficient and smellier than stinky tofu. One Asian donor admitted to the Los Angeles Times "to lacking the legal-resident status required for giving campaign money." Another, Hsiao Wen Yang, told the New York Post she was reimbursed for her $1,000 - setting off clear alarm bells over yet another possible straw donor scheme on the heels of Norman Hsu-gate.

The headline of Malkin's column on NRO read: "A Time to Discriminate: 'Profile' foreign donors? Of course!"

Malkin also wrote:

"I'm going to keep reaching out to everybody in our country. I want to be a president to everybody," said a defiant Hillary in defense of her indiscriminate fundraising. "Asian-Americans in Chinatown and Flushing have the same right to contribute as every other American," Howard Wolfson, a campaign spokesman, told several newspapers. "We do not ethnically profile donors."

"Ethnic profiling" is the rhetorical bugaboo the Clintons hope will stave off more investigations and invocations of Asian-American donor scandals past. Learning well from their far-left minority counterparts, these Asian-American groups have tried to turn the debate away from candidate and donor responsibility to the collective "rights" of the entire Asian American and Pacific Islander community.

Malkin concluded: "If it's 'ethnic profiling' to be extra-careful of Chinatown donors who can't speak English, live in dilapidated buildings, have never voted, can't tell Hillary Clinton from Hunan Chicken or simply can't be found, then 'ethnic profiling' should be the standard procedure of every responsible campaign."

FROM: Media Matters

victorylee0516
(victoria lee)
41F

1/22/2008 12:16 am

    Quoting touch213:
    ethic reforms is the first matter addressed by the 110th congress.. here in Louisiana, ethic is the first matter addressed by the new governor..

    you speak of engaging conversation.. but as it's engaged, you slander it by the invokation of assumption.. to derogatory claim, that I know it all, when I've not said such... but you have such disdain for the expression of 'Opinion" then why seek to have engaging conversation, lest it be that you seek.. patronizing commentary.. of which you again claim .. disdain for... so of peculiarity.. of what matters of engaging do you seek, or do you desire to determine what the engaging commentary can or must contain that suits with your... stance??
    quite a peculiar scenario... shall I just resort to tell you that you are pretty... as a first or last phrase in commentary... to meet your standard of what is engagements...
Is typical response of man with one point of view so what. I not really caring your point of view. Is typical to say slander and disdain to protect yourself.


touch213 69M

1/17/2008 4:33 pm

    Quoting victorylee0516:
    Oh, sheeeeeeeeeesh, you missing the point again, oh great expert on everything under the sun, this is example of how one chinese guy trying buy influence in democrat party and democrats not caring where the money coming from at all.

    They saying is not about ethnics and other asians say hey is ok to corrupt the system but why you picking on Asians cause everyone else doing this.

    You got the thin skin or something?
ethic reforms is the first matter addressed by the 110th congress.. here in Louisiana, ethic is the first matter addressed by the new governor..

you speak of engaging conversation.. but as it's engaged, you slander it by the invokation of assumption.. to derogatory claim, that I know it all, when I've not said such... but you have such disdain for the expression of 'Opinion" then why seek to have engaging conversation, lest it be that you seek.. patronizing commentary.. of which you again claim .. disdain for... so of peculiarity.. of what matters of engaging do you seek, or do you desire to determine what the engaging commentary can or must contain that suits with your... stance??
quite a peculiar scenario... shall I just resort to tell you that you are pretty... as a first or last phrase in commentary... to meet your standard of what is engagements...


victorylee0516
(victoria lee)
41F

1/17/2008 3:12 pm

    Quoting touch213:
    political money never cares where it comes from.. until attention draws it's "forms" of attention, so let's not specify democrats, because it's a matter relative to all political platform group participants.. including the office seeker themselves .. and the matter of buying influence is a matter that colludes the spectrum.. not less to one than unto the other..
Oh, sheeeeeeeeeesh, you missing the point again, oh great expert on everything under the sun, this is example of how one chinese guy trying buy influence in democrat party and democrats not caring where the money coming from at all.

They saying is not about ethnics and other asians say hey is ok to corrupt the system but why you picking on Asians cause everyone else doing this.

You got the thin skin or something?


touch213 69M

1/17/2008 2:24 pm

political money never cares where it comes from.. until attention draws it's "forms" of attention, so let's not specify democrats, because it's a matter relative to all political platform group participants.. including the office seeker themselves .. and the matter of buying influence is a matter that colludes the spectrum.. not less to one than unto the other..


victorylee0516
(victoria lee)
41F

1/17/2008 10:33 am

Perhaps. The Democrats don't care where they get their money from and when they get caught with dirty money instead of returning it to the ones who were forced to donate they give the money to their favorite charity.


usamariyana
(you li)
71F

1/17/2008 12:52 am

Good news always


niyyah2007 62M

1/16/2008 5:33 pm

You go gettem' girl!Have you written to your congressman?Have you written articles(maybe even your own collum)for many news publications?Have you sought out an "Asian-American rights activist organization recently?Hope so.Maybe you could even appear on Oprah!!